Attitudes and Barriers of Interior Designers to Practice Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design in Bengaluru

Authors

  • Mayukha C Katari Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru Author
  • Vidhya M. S. Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru Author
  • N. S. Nalini Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru Author
  • Rama R Subrahmanian Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68127/f4epfp70

Keywords:

Bengaluru, Implementation Barriers, Sustainability Awareness, Sustainable Interior Design (SIAD)

Abstract

The principle of sustainable interior design is still not prevalent in practice. The objective of this study is to find and analyze the issues architects and interior designers face in implementing Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design (SIAD) in Bengaluru. This study used a literature review and a questionnaire survey to assess the challenges faced. The findings were based on the opinions of 60 architects and interior designers. Thus, the obstacles that impede the practice of sustainability have been identified, and their importance has been assessed by means of a 5-point Likert scale. The results indicate that the architects and interior designers are aware of the environmental significance of the SIAD. Nevertheless, the overall assessment of its usage was only 3.45 out of 5. The most important obstacles mentioned in this study are designers’ training (4.03), insufficient interest of clients (3.93), high costs (3.55), unfavorable regulations (3.43), the problem of obtaining the necessary materials (3.28), and inadequate knowledge of clients (2.92). The results obtained allow researchers to create a framework for discussing SIAD issues.

Author Biographies

  • Mayukha C Katari, Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru

    M.Arch Student, Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru 560078

  • N. S. Nalini, Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru

    Professor, Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru 560078.

  • Rama R Subrahmanian, Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru

    Professor, Dayananda Sagar College of Architecture, DSI Campus, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru 560078.

References

[1] O. Iwuanyanwu, I. Gil-Ozoudeh, C. Ike, and A. Okwandu, “Cultural and social dimensions of green architecture: Designing for sustainability and community well-being,” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1951–1968, 2024.

[2] N. R. Govind and H. Ramesh, “The impact of spatiotemporal patterns of land use land cover and land surface temperature on an urban cool island: A case study of Bengaluru,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 191, no. 5, 2019.

[3] T. V. Ramachandra, T. Mondal, B. Settur, and B. H. Aithal, “Environmental consequences in the neighbourhood of rapid unplanned urbanisation in Bangalore City,” Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2023.

[4] Y. Alassaf, “Comprehensive review of the advancements, benefits, challenges, and design integration of energy-efficient materials for sustainable buildings,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 9, Art. no. 2994, 2024.

[5] United Nations Environment Programme, 2023 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction, 2024.

[6] J. P. Horo and M. Punia, “Towards a unifying approach to city sustainability on the changing expression of urbanisation in Bengaluru,” in Smart Cities—Opportunities and Challenges, S. Ahmed, S. M. Abbas, and H. Zia, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 779–795.

[7] N. Sushma R. N., “A review of using the green buildings strategy to reduce the effects of unplanned urbanization in Bengaluru,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2041–2047, 2023.

[8] K. V. Raju, A. Ravindra, S. Manasi, K. C. Smitha, and R. Srinivas, “Trends and status of environmental resource use in Bengaluru Metropolitan Area (BMA),” in Environmental Resource Management in Bengaluru Metropolitan Area, 2018, pp. 109–247.

[9] C. Sekhar and R. Raina, “Towards more sustainable future: Assessment of sustainability literacy among the future managers in India,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15830–15856, 2021.

[10] M. Feria and M. Amado, “Architectural design: Sustainability in the decision-making process,” Buildings, vol. 9, no. 5, Art. no. 135, 2019.

[11] M. Ashour, A. Mahdiyar, S. H. Haron, and M. H. Hanafi, “Barriers to the practice of sustainable interior architecture and design for interior renovations: A parsimonious-cybernetic fuzzy AHP approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 366, Art. no. 132958, 2022.

[12] Y. Lee, “Communicating sustainable development: Effects of stakeholder-centric perceived sustainability,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1540–1551, 2020.

[13] C. Du Plessis, “A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2007.

[14] S. A. Kushwaha, J. R. Pitroda, and G. Ray, “Exploring barriers and opportunities for sustainable construction practices: A review,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1–9, 2025.

[15] P. Pradhananga, M. Elzomor, and G. Santi Kasabdji, “Barriers and drivers to the adoption of sustainable construction practices in developing countries: A case study of Venezuela,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, 2021.

[16] A. Khandelwal, “Breaking barriers: A paradigm shift towards environmental responsibility in the interior design industry,” The Times of India, Jul. 17, 2023.

[17] R. Chowdhury, “Holistic flexibility for deploying systems thinking as a cognitive skill,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 803–825, 2023.

[18] T. Varkey, B. Tom, and B. Augustine, “Sustainability in architectural education in India,” in Proc. 2022 Second International Conference on Next Generation Intelligent Systems (ICNGIS), 2022, pp. 1–6.

[19] A. Bhagat and A. Kumar, “An evaluation framework for sustainable urban streets (SUS) in India: The case study of Bengaluru City,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25014–25020, 2025.

[20] R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes,” Archives of Psychology, vol. 140, pp. 1–55, 1932.

[21] W. Rashdan and A. F. Ashour, “Exploring sustainability in interior design: A comprehensive systematic review,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 8, Art. no. 2303, 2024.

[22] K. Gupta, “Toward sustainable design—The excluded issues: LEED rating system in India,” 2009.

[23] U. Patel, S. Rakshit, S. A. Ram, and Z. B. Irfan, “Urban sustainability index: Measuring performance of 15 metropolitan cities of India,” South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, pp. 1–11, 2019.

[24] M. R. Shaker, B. S. Eustace, H. K. G. Erukala, R. G. Patel, M. B. Mohammed, M. A. Jabri, K. Desai, R. Goyal, and B. Chang, “Analysis of survey on barriers to the implementation of sustainable projects,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 24, Art. no. 16830, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.